Investors often blame the investment itself when things go wrong. A fund underperforms, a stock declines, or a portfolio experiences volatility. The instinct is to point to the asset and label it a “bad investment.”
But in many cases, the problem is not the investment. The problem is how investors behave.
Emotions such as fear, greed and impatience frequently lead investors to make decisions that undermine even strong investment opportunities. This dynamic becomes especially important in retirement, when portfolio stability and long-term discipline matter more than ever.
The Difference Between Investing and Investor Behavior
Modern markets offer a wide range of investment choices. Over long periods of time, many diversified investments have historically produced positive results. However, investors rarely experience those returns exactly as the investments deliver them.
Why? Because human behavior interferes.
Investors often buy assets after strong performance has already attracted attention. When markets inevitably fluctuate or decline, anxiety takes over and the same investors sell, often locking in losses. The cycle then repeats when the investment begins performing well again.
The investment itself may not have failed. The investor’s timing did.
A Famous Example from Investment History
One of the most striking examples comes from the Fidelity Magellan Fund under legendary investor Peter Lynch.
Between 1977 and 1990, Lynch produced an extraordinary average annual return of about 29 percent. During the same period, the S&P 500 delivered roughly 15.8 percent per year. The difference was remarkable.
An investor who placed $100,000 into the Magellan Fund at the beginning of Lynch’s tenure and simply held the investment through the entire period would have seen that investment grow to nearly $2.8 million. The same investment in the S&P 500 would have grown to approximately $688,000.
Those are exceptional results by any standard.
Yet, the most surprising statistic is not the fund’s performance. It is the experience of the average investor in the fund.
When Great Investments Produce Poor Results
Despite the fund’s outstanding long-term returns, many investors in the Magellan Fund actually lost money during the same period.
How is that possible?
The explanation lies in investor behavior. Investors frequently bought the fund after strong performance attracted media attention and enthusiasm. When market volatility arrived, many of those same investors sold their shares out of fear. Once the fund recovered and began performing again, investors returned.
This pattern of buying high and selling low repeated itself over time.
In other words, the investment worked. The strategy failed.
Why This Matters for Retirement Investors
This lesson becomes particularly important for those approaching or living in retirement.
Retirement portfolios are built with the expectation that markets will fluctuate. Short-term volatility is not unusual. In fact, it is inevitable. Investors who abandon long-term strategies during temporary downturns often damage the very financial security they are trying to protect.
One of the most significant risks retirees face is behavioral. Emotional reactions to market movements can interrupt a carefully constructed retirement plan. Selling during downturns and reentering markets later can permanently reduce portfolio growth and income sustainability.
The Power of Discipline in Long-Term Investing
The simplest investment strategies often prove to be the most effective. Consistent contributions, diversified portfolios and long-term discipline tend to outperform attempts to predict short-term market movements.
The Magellan Fund example highlights an important truth. An investor who simply stayed invested through volatility would have benefited enormously. Those who tried to outsmart the market frequently missed the opportunity entirely.
For retirement investors, the lesson is clear. Success is rarely about finding the perfect investment. It is far more often about maintaining the right behavior.
The Real Question Investors Should Ask
When evaluating investment results, the most useful question may not be whether the investment itself was flawed.
Instead, investors should ask a more revealing question.
Was the investment truly bad, or was the strategy of the investor the real problem?
Understanding that distinction can make the difference between a retirement portfolio that steadily supports financial independence and one that struggles despite strong opportunities in the market.
By Andrew Rosen, Contributor
© 2026 Forbes Media LLC. All Rights Reserved
This Forbes article was legally licensed through AdvisorStream.
Information from third parties may be proprietary, privileged and/or confidential, any use, copying, retention or disclosure is strictly prohibited. Securities and investment advisory services offered through qualified registered representatives of MML Investors Services, LLC, Member SIPC. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and may not accurately reflect those of MML Investors Services, or its affiliated companies. Local firms are sales offices of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (MassMutual), and are not subsidiaries or affiliates of MassMutual, MML Investors Services, or their affiliated companies.
Nathan Brinkman is a registered representative and offers securities and investment advisory services through MML Investors Services, LLC. Member SIPC (www.sipc.org) Supervisory office: 900 E 96th St. Ste 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 469-9999. Triumph Wealth Management, LLC is not a subsidiary or affiliate of MML Investors Services, LLC or its affiliated companies. Nathan Brinkman: CA Insurance License #0C27168
